Electronically conducting fuel cell component with directly bonded layers and method for making the same

ABSTRACT

An electronically conducting fuel cell component is composed of a porous metal flow field, an intermediate layer bonded directly to the flow field and an electrode bonded directly to the intermediate layer. The direct bonding eliminates the need for tie rods or other mechanical pressure to maintain the electrical contact of the fuel cell component layers.

This application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. Nos.60/181,893, and 60/181,894, filed Feb. 11, 2000, which are incorporatedherein by reference.

The U.S. government may have certain rights in this invention pursuantto Grant Number N00014-95-1-0114, which was awarded by the Office ofNavel Research.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to the field of electrical powergeneration, and more particularly to the generation of electrical powerusing an electrochemical fuel cell.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A fuel cell is an energy conversion device that efficiently convertsstored chemical energy into electrical energy. Conventional fuel cellsgenerally operate by combining hydrogen with oxygen to generate directcurrent electrical power. The overall chemical reaction for this processis described by Equation 1.

2H₂+O₂→2H₂O  Equation 1.

In order to generate enough power to be usable for practicalapplications, multiple fuel cells are combined electrically in series.In this stacked configuration, the individual fuel cells are connectedone after another, similar to the cells of a conventional voltaicbattery.

At its fundamental level, the individual fuel cell contains an electrodeat which oxygen is reduced (the cathode) and another electrode at whichfuel is oxidized (the anode). Fuel cell electrodes are generally of thegas diffusion type and are made of an electrically-conducting supportmaterial, an active catalytic layer, and an electrolyte.

Chemical pore-formers have been used to control the porosity of theselayers. These pore-formers, or porophoric agents, are added as powdersor crystals to the compositions of the various layers. The pore-formerseventually decompose in the gas phase or are dissolved in solution inpost-fabrication steps. Conventional pore formers include powderedammonium bicarbonate, ammonium chloride, and urea, which are either lostin the gas phase or via dissolution. Such particles are generally coarseand operate like yeast in dough, forming a sponge-like structure withrather coarse porosity. These pore-formers are too large to becompatible with the thin active layers that can be prepared by methodssuch as paint- or ink-like application or rolling (calendering).

The membrane electrode assembly (MEA), which is composed of the anode,cathode and electrolyte membrane, is generally sandwiched between gasflow-fields. These flow fields allow the reactant gases (separatestreams of H₂ and O₂) to contact the MEA. Conventional flow-fields areformed by pore-free grooved graphite plates, wherein the reactant gasesflow through a serpentine-shaped groove. A drawback to this type of flowfield is that it requires heavy tie rods and end-plates to compress theflow-fields and MEAs together to maintain electrical contact.

In a fuel cell stack, the individual fuel cells are connected to eachother by bipolar plates. The bipolar plates provide electrical contactbetween the cells and may also be involved in cooling the stack. Onceagain, the traditional approach is to maintain contact between the cellsand the bipolar plates by applying pressure to the stack usingend-plates squeezed together by heavy tie rods.

Porous metals are an attractive alternative to heavy graphite flowfields. Porous metals that have been used as flow field material includeporous copper, porous nickel, porous aluminum, porous titanium, andporous aluminum-titanium alloys (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,022,634 and6,146,780). The fuel cells shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,022,634 use porousmetal flow fields and collapsed porous metal current collectors. Thesecomponents are pressed together between endplates and still require tierods or some means of applying external pressure to the cells tomaintain electrical contact between the components. Flow-fields shown inU.S. Pat. No. 6,146,780 are made of metal foams that are spot welded togas impermeable bipolar separator plates.

The polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) material generally used inpolymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) is generally composedof a linear, branched-chain perfluorinated polyether polymer with anon-crosslinked structure that has terminal sulfonic acid endgroups. Anexample of such material is Nafion® (Du Pont de Nemours and Company,Wilmington, Del.). Nafion® requires a substantial amount of water(typically 10-20 water molecules per sulfonic acid group) to giveadequate proton conductivity. The high water requirements are due to thevolume occupied by the hydrophobic fluorinated sulfonic acid polymerchain. Proton conduction only takes place down self-organizinghydrophilic channels or micelles which occupy only a small portion ofthe total superficial area of a PEM electrolyte film, reducing thecorresponding specific conductivity compared with the local value in thechannels. The hydrophobicity of the polymer chain also limits the localamount of water associated with the sulfonic acid. This amount of waterincreases rapidly as the equivalent weight or the ratio of the molecularweight of polymer chain to sulfonic acid becomes less, and it falls withincreasing temperature. Conductivity is highest when liquid water is incontact with the membrane at any given temperature. For this reason,developers have generally supplied PEMFCs with the reactants (hydrogenand air) humidified to at least the cell operating temperature, so thatproduct water is formed in the liquid state.

Since the system must generally operate below the local boiling point ofwater, excess water used for humidification, plus the product water fromthe reaction, collects in the cathode gas flow channels. Means musttherefore be provided to continuously remove it. The fact that the PEMFCproduces liquid water under normal circumstances is a major operationalflaw and considerable ingenuity is required to deal with it, especiallyin larger cells.

In the General Electric Company fuel cell used in the Gemini spacemissions starting in 1965, water was required to be removed in amicrogravity environment. Water management was accomplished by providinga wicking material in the cathode flow channels of each cell. The exitend of the wick in each individual cell communicated over the activewidth of the cell with a porous water separator plate arranged inparallel with the cells in the stack. A differential oxygen pressuredrove the water through this separator plate to a product wateraccumulator for storage as drinking water and for recycle to the entryside of each wick to maintain conductivity (Appleby et al., Energy 11:137 (1986); Liebhavsky et al., Fuel Cells and Fuel Batteries, AcademicPress, 587 (1964)).

In the Gemini cell, the membrane was not fluorinated for stability andoperated at close to ambient temperature and at low current density forhigh efficiency. The non-fluorinated membrane was prone to hot-spotswith gas-crossover, and was replaced by Nafion® as soon as it becameavailable in the late 1960s. In the Ballard stack design (Prater et al.,J. Power Sources, 61: 105 (1996), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,521,018 5,527,363,and 5,547,776), the water is forced out of the cathode flow channels byapplying a large pressure differential between the inlet and exit side.This requires the use of very long, serpentine flow channels, each witha length many times the cell width (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,988,583 and5,108,849). While Ballard has looked at other systems for removingwater, a vapor phase feedback loop at the anode (after back-diffusionfrom the cathode channels) (U.S. Pat. No. 5,441,819), the serpentinechannel design is still retained. This design means that the stack willonly operate under pressurized conditions, with a minimum operatingpressure between 2 and 3 atmospheres absolute (atma) of air. Pressurizedoperation requires either a stack with heavy filter-press components ora pressure vessel surrounding the stack. Both of these reduce theflexibility of stack design, and necessitate the use of liquid coolingsystem with an external radiator. The reactants are prehumidified tocell operating temperature by passing them throughmembrane-humidification cells which may or may not be arranged en blocwith the electrochemical stack. The water circulation in thehumidification cells is deionized cooling water exiting the coolingplates (generally, one every 4 or 5 active cells) in the electrochemicalstack.

In the International Fuel Cells stack design (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,769,297and 5,503,944), a graphite wicking plate with controlled porosity isused on the cathode side. The graphite plate has deionized water coolingflow channels on its reverse side, which contact a similar porousgraphite wicking plate on the anode side of the next cell. Thus, thereis one cooling plate per cell. The anode side of each cell ispressurized to −0.075 to −0.15 atmospheres gauge (atmg) compared to thecooling water stream, and the cathode side is correspondingly at +0.075to +0.15 atmg. This means that there is a net flow of pure water fromthe cooling stream to the anode for humidification, and a correspondingflow of this and product water from the cathode channels to the coolingstream. All of the above approaches require controlled pressuredifferentials that are unsuitable for use in small lightweight stacks.They also use a water-cooling subsystem, which requires a heatexchanger, pumps, and controls, which add weight, as do the elementsrequired for humidification. While such humidification is active, itproceeds automatically in each cell, and may be called internalhumidification to distinguish it from external humidification via thereactant gases before they are led into the cell.

In true internal- or self-humidification, a portion of the waterproduced in the fuel cell reaction is reabsorbed by the membraneelectrolyte keeping the latter moist during fuel cell operation (U.S.Pat. Nos. 5,242,764 and 5,318,863; Dhar, J. Electroanal. Chem., 357: 237(1993)). This requires back-diffusion of water from the cathode to theanode side, hence a thin PEM film. In addition, it requires the use ofrather short flow channels, so that efficient back-diffusion of watercan occur, preferably in a counter-flow system or one operatingdead-headed on hydrogen. It also requires careful control of oxygenutilization, hence air-flow rate as a function of current density, aswell as that of cell temperature. For example, if oxygen utilization indry air cathode reactant is 50%, the cathode exit gas is humidified to0.182 atm, or 138 torr at 1 atma total pressure. This sets an upperlimit of cell operating temperature of about 59° C. at the cell exit,since this must not exceed the dew point of the reactant gases at anypoint in the cell. The cathode exit should also be the hottest part ofthe cell so if the system is air-cooled by a separate air stream,cooling air and process air should be co-flow. In practice, the maximumaverage cell temperature should be in the 50-55° C. range to ensure thatthe anode and cathode inlets, which operate under the lowest dew pointconditions, function satisfactorily.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One aspect of the invention is a method of making a gas diffusionelectrode comprising the steps of forming an electrode on a substrate byapplying a mixture comprising a polymer electrolyte, an electrocatalyst,and a nanosized pore-former to the substrate; and treating the electrodeto remove the nanosized pore-former. According to one embodiment thepore-former comprises fumed silica.

A further aspect of the invention is a method for making a membraneelectrode assembly comprising the steps of forming an electrode on asubstrate by applying a mixture comprising a polymer electrolyte, anelectrocatalyst, and a nanosized pore-former to the substrate; attachingthe electrode to a membrane to form a membrane electrode assembly; andtreating the electrode to remove the pore-former.

A still further aspect is a method for making a gas permeable layer foruse in a gas diffusion electrode comprising the steps of applying to acomposition a nanosized pore-former; and treating the composition toremove the nanosized pore-former. A further aspect of the invention isan electrode comprising a polymer electrolyte, an electrocatalyst, andnanosized pores.

Another aspect of the invention is an electronically conducting fuelcell component comprising a porous metal flow field, an intermediatelayer bonded directly to the porous metal flow field, and an electrodebonded directly to the intermediate layer. A still further aspect of thepresent invention is a method for making an electronically conductingfuel cell component comprising the steps of directly bonding anelectrically conducting intermediate layer to a porous flow field, anddirectly bonding an electrode to the intermediate layer.

A further aspect of the invention is a fuel cell comprising first andsecond monolithic electrically conducting flow field-bipolar plateassemblies arranged essentially parallel to each other such that aninside surface of the first flow field-bipolar plate assembly is facingan inside surface of the second flow field-bipolar plate assembly,wherein the flow field-bipolar plate assemblies are electrically andmechanically connected by intervening layers. The intervening layers maycomprise a first electrically conducting intermediate layer bondeddirectly to the inside surface of the first flow field-bipolar plateassembly, a second electrically conducting intermediate layer bondeddirectly to the inside surface of the second flow field-bipolar plateassembly, a first electrode bonded directly to the inside surface of thefirst electrically conducting intermediate layer, a second electrodebonded directly to the inside surface of the second electricallyconducting intermediate layer, and a polymer electrolyte membranebetween and bonded directly to both of the electrodes.

A still further aspect of the present is an electrochemical fuel cellstack comprising two electrically conducting end-plates and a pluralityof electrochemical fuel cells disposed between the endplates. Theelectrochemical fuel cells may comprise first and second monolithicelectrically conducting flow field-bipolar plate assemblies arrangedessentially parallel to each other such that an inside surface of thefirst flow field-bipolar plate assembly is facing an inside surface ofthe second flow field-bipolar plate assembly, wherein the flowfield-bipolar plate assemblies are electrically and mechanicallyconnected by intervening layers. The intervening layers may comprise afirst electrically conducting intermediate layer bonded directly to theinside surface of the first flow field-bipolar plate assembly, a secondelectrically conducting intermediate layer bonded directly to the insidesurface of the second flow field-bipolar plate assembly, a firstelectrode bonded directly to the inside surface of the firstelectrically conducting intermediate layer, a second electrode bondeddirectly to the inside surface of the second electrically conductingintermediate layer, and a polymer electrolyte membrane between andbonded directly to both of the electrodes.

A further aspect of the invention is a method of making a fuel cellstack comprising disposing between two electrically conducting endplatesa plurality of electrochemical fuel cells, wherein the electrochemicalfuel cells comprise first and second monolithic electrically conductingflow field-bipolar plate assemblies arranged essentially parallel toeach other such that an inside surface of the first flow field-bipolarplate assembly is facing an inside surface of the second flowfield-bipolar plate assembly, and wherein the flow field-bipolar plateassemblies are electrically and mechanically connected by interveninglayers. The intervening layers may comprise a first electricallyconducting intermediate layer bonded directly to the inside surface ofthe first flow field-bipolar plate assembly, a second electricallyconducting intermediate layer bonded directly to the inside surface ofthe second flow field-bipolar plate assembly, a first electrode bondeddirectly to the inside surface of the first electrically conductingintermediate layer, a second electrode bonded directly to the insidesurface of the second electrically conducting intermediate layer, and apolymer electrolyte membrane disposed between and bonded directly toboth of the electrodes.

A still further aspect of the invention is method of generatingelectrical power comprising supplying hydrogen and oxygen to anelectrochemical fuel cell stack, wherein the electrochemical fuel cellstack comprises two electrically conducting end-plates and a pluralityof electrochemical fuel cells disposed between the endplates; whereinthe electrochemical fuel cells comprise first and second monolithicelectrically conducting flow field-bipolar plate assemblies arrangedessentially parallel to each other such that an inside surface of thefirst flow field-bipolar plate assembly is facing an inside surface ofthe second flow field-bipolar plate assembly, and wherein the flowfield-bipolar plates assemblies are electrically and mechanicallyconnected by intervening layers. The intervening layers may comprise afirst electrically conducting intermediate layer bonded directly to theinside surface of the first flow field-bipolar plate assembly, a secondelectrically conducting intermediate layer bonded directly to the insidesurface of the second flow field-bipolar plate assembly, a firstelectrode bonded directly to the inside surface of the firstelectrically conducting intermediate layer, a second electrode bondeddirectly to the inside surface of the second electrically conductingintermediate layer, and a polymer electrolyte membrane between andbonded directly to both of the electrodes.

Yet a further aspect of the invention is an air cooled condenser for usewith a fuel cell stack, the condenser comprising a three-dimensionallyreticulated porous metal condensing element and a three-dimensionallyreticulated porous metal cooling element, wherein thethree-dimensionally reticulated porous metal condensing element isdisposed between two gas impermeable barriers by continuousmetallurgical bonds, and wherein the three dimensionally reticulatedporous metal cooling element is disposed between and bonded directly totwo other gas impermeable barriers.

A further aspect of the present invention is an evaporatively cooledinternally humidified fuel cell stack comprising a plurality of fuelcells and an air cooled condenser in fluid communication with the fuelcells, wherein the condenser comprises a plurality ofthree-dimensionally reticulated porous metal condensing elements and aplurality of three-dimensionally reticulated porous metal coolingelements, wherein the three-dimensionally reticulated porous metalcondensing elements are disposed between and bonded to two gasimpermeable barriers by continuous metallurgical bonds, and wherein thethree-dimensionally reticulated porous metal cooling elements aredisposed between and bonded directly to two other gas impermeablebarriers.

A still further aspect of the invention is a method of cooling anelectrochemical fuel cell comprising placing the electrochemical fuelcell in fluid communication with an air cooled condenser wherein the aircooled condenser comprises a plurality of three-dimensionallyreticulated porous metal condensing elements and a plurality ofthree-dimensionally reticulated porous metal cooling elements, whereinthe three-dimensionally reticulated porous metal condensing elements aredisposed between and bonded to two gas impermeable barriers bycontinuous metallurgical bonds, and wherein the three-dimensionallyreticulated porous metal cooling elements are disposed between andbonded directly to two other gas impermeable barriers.

A still further aspect of the invention is a flow field-bipolar plateassembly for an electrochemical cell, comprising a first and secondthree-dimensional reticulated porous metal flow-fields bonded directlyto opposite sides of an electrically conducting gas impermeable barrierby continuous metallurgical bonds.

A further aspect of the invention is a method of delivering a gas to afuel cell electrode comprising delivering the gas to a porous metal flowfield-bipolar plate assembly wherein the porous metal flow field-bipolarplate assembly comprises an electrically conducting gas barrier and athree-dimensionally reticulated porous metal flow field bonded to oneside of the electrically conducting gas barrier by a continuousmetallurgical bond; wherein the gas contacts the three-dimensionallyreticulated porous metal flow field and diffuses into contact with anelectrode that is in gas communication with the three-dimensionallyreticulated porous metal flow-field.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a flow field-bipolar plate assembly comprising anelectrically conducting gas barrier 1 and porous metal flow-fields 2bonded to each side by continuous metallurgic bonds at the surfaces 3.

FIG. 2 shows a fuel cell comprising flow field-bipolar plate assemblies4, intermediate layers 5, electrodes 6, and a PEM 7, wherein the flowfield-bipolar plate assemblies comprise an electrically conducting gasbarrier 9 and porous metal flow-fields 8 bonded to each side bycontinuous metallurgic bonds at the surfaces 10.

FIG. 3 shows a flow field-bipolar plate assembly comprising porous metalflow field components 11 metalurgically bonded to imperviouselectronically conducting plates or gas barrier 12. The cooling platecomprises a porous metal cooling field 13, disposed between two gasbarriers 12.

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of complete 5 kW Version II assembly. Thefuel cell stack is on bottom and an air-cooled condenser is on top.According to one embodiment, the height is 20.5 cm, the width 10.7 cm,and the length 32.8 cm.

FIG. 5 shows potential-current density plot for MEA with 3.9 mg-cm⁻² Ptelectrodes and Nafion® 112 membrane, 5 cm² cell, 70° C., 1.0 atma,humidified hydrogen and air.

FIG. 6 shows potential-current density plots for cells with differing wt% Pt on C electrocatalyst loadings. 5 cm² cell, cathode Pt loading 1.4mg-cm⁻², anode loading 0.3 mg-cm⁻², 20 mm GORE-SELECT® membranes, 50°C., 1.0 atma, humidified hydrogen/air.

FIG. 7 shows Tafel plots for the data from FIG. 6.

FIG. 8 shows potential-current density plots for 1.2 mg-cm⁻² (cathode),0.05 mg-cm⁻² (anode) hydrogen/air cells with different weight % ofpore-former used to prepare cathode active layers.

FIG. 9 shows potential-current density plots for hydrogen/oxygen cellswith different weight % of pore-former used to prepare cathode activelayers.

FIG. 10 shows current density (at constant V) vs. wt % of pore-former.50 cm² hydrogen/air cells.

FIG. 11 shows the Ohmic resistance vs. amount of pore-former in cathodeactive layer. 50 cm² hydrogen/oxygen cells.

FIG. 12 shows the dependence of current-voltage characteristics of PEMfuel cell with aluminum flow fields on the time of operation,temperature 50° C., atmospheric pressure, externally humidifiedhydrogen/air.

FIG. 13 shows the long-term performance of MEA with 0.4 mg-cm platinumloading E-TEK electrodes and Nafion® 112 membrane, 50° C., 1.0 atma,externally humidified hydrogen/oxygen.

FIG. 14 shows Tafel plots for the data from FIG. 16.

FIG. 15 shows potential-current density plots as a function of operatingtime at 0.6 V for a 5 cm² MEA with 0.4 mg-cm⁻² E-TEK electrodes andNafion® 115 membrane in titanium nitride coated stainless steelflow-fields. 50° C., 1.0 atma, externally humidified hydrogen/air.

FIG. 16 shows Tafel plots of the data from FIG. 15.

FIG. 17 shows potential-current density plots for 5 cm² MEAs with 0.4mg-cm⁻² platinum loading electrodes and Nafion® 112 membranes ingraphite and platinum coated titanium flow-fields. 50° C., 1.0 atma,externally humidified hydrogen/oxygen.

FIG. 18 shows a comparison of electrodes directly bonded to porous flowfields (circles), and electrodes in mechanical contact with ribbedgraphite (squares) and porous nickel (dotted line).

FIG. 19 shows current-potential results for hydrogen-air single cellswith standard ribbed graphite and high-porosity unribbed nickel flowfields.

FIG. 20 shows current-potential-current density plots forhydrogen-oxygen single cells with standard ribbed graphite andhigh-porosity nickel flow fields.

FIG. 21 shows gas diffusion limitations for hydrogen-air single cellswith standard ribbed graphite and high-porosity nickel flow fields.

FIG. 22 shows potential-current density plots for 50 cm² hydrogen/airsingle cells with ribbed graphite and high-porosity nickel foamflow-fields. 50° C., 1.0 atma, hydrogen/air.

FIG. 23 shows endurance test of 50 cm² single cell at 0.6 V with nickelfoam flow-fields. 50° C., 1.0 atma, hydrogen/air.

FIG. 24 shows potential vs. current density plots for hydrogen-airsingle cells with “contact to electrode” and with “directly fabricatedelectrode” structures on a high-porosity nickel flow field.

FIG. 25 shows cell potential difference vs. current density plots forhydrogen-oxygen and hydrogen-air single cells with “Direct Assembly” andwith “Mechanical Contact” structures on a high-porosity nickel flowfield.

FIG. 26 shows potential-current density plots for hydrogen-oxygen singlecells with “Direct Assembly” and “Mechanical Contact” structures on ahigh-porosity nickel flow field.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to proton exchange membrane fuel cells(PEMFCs). The following definitions apply to the specification andclaims of this application:

The term “membrane-electrode-assembly (MEA)” refers to the combinationof electrodes (the anode and cathode structures) and the electrolytemembrane.

The term “electrode” refers to an electrocatalytically active layerwhere an electrochemical reaction takes place.

The term “cathode” refers to the electrode at which oxygen is reducedand the term “anode” refers to the electrode at which fuel is oxidized.

The term “electrolyte membrane” refers to a solid membrane having anionic conductivity.

The term “bipolar plate” refers to a gas impermeable, electricallyconducting plate that separates the fuel cells.

The term “directly bonded” refers to intimate physical and electricalcontact between two components that is maintained at the point ofcontact, even in the absence of externally applied pressure or otherconnectors such as spot welds.

The term “intermediate layer” refers to an electrically conductingporous layer disposed between a flow field and an electrode.

The term “continuous metallurgical bond” refers to a bond between metalcomponents such that they are metalurgically bonded to each otherthroughout most of the plane of contact between the components. Thisexcludes spot welding and methods wherein physical and electricalcontact is maintained solely by means of externally applied pressuresuch as tie rods.

The term “monolithic” describes a component that may comprise aplurality of sub-components, but wherein physical, mechanical, andelectrical contact is maintained between the sub-components, even in theabsence of external applied pressure or other connectors such as spotwelds.

The term “nanosized” describes a particle or entity that has dimensionssmaller than about 10⁻⁴ cm.

The term “nanopore” refers to a pore or vacancy that has dimensionssmaller than about 10⁻⁴ cm.

The term “flow field-bipolar plate assembly” refers to a monolithicintercell electronically conducting structure comprising metal flowfields on opposite sides of an electronically conducting gas impermeableplate or sheet acting a bipolar plate.

Sulfonated proton exchange membranes (PEMS) with fluorinated polymerbackbones are particularly suitable as electrolyte membranes. They arechemically stable beyond their glass-transition-temperature of about155° C. under almost all conditions, but can only operate aselectrolytes when they contain enough excess water to allow protonmobility. Usual water vapor partial pressures under typical fuel celloperating conditions are about 0.15-0.2 atm at a total pressure of 1 atmon air at 50% oxygen utilization, about 0.3 atm with pure oxygen at 1atm pressure, or 1 atm at 3 atm pure oxygen pressure, allow maximumoperating temperatures of about 65° C., 70° C., and 100° C.,respectively. Examples of sulfonated PEMs are Nafion® 117 (DuPont), inwhich the first two numbers of the designation refer to the equivalentweight (1100 Daltons), and the third is the thickness (7 mils, 175 μm).The thinner Nafion® 115 (5 mils, 125 μm), and 105 (equivalent weight1000 Daltons, 5 mils) are also available.

The high-stability fluorinated backbone of the Nafion® membrane containsthe same chemical structures as a combination of the Teflons® TFE(polytetrafluoroethylene), FEP (perfluoroethylene-perfluoropropylenecopolymer) and PFA (perfluoroalkoxy), i.e.,

—(CF₂CF₂)_(n)—CF(CF₂—)—O—[CF₂—CF(CF₃)—O—]_(m),(CF₂)_(x)SO₃H

where the —(CF₂CF₂)_(n)—CF(CF₂—) structures arise from copolymerizationof tetrafluoroethylene and CF₂═CF—O— vinyl ethers. Because of thesynthetic methods used, x=2, and n is normally 2-3 with m=1 for Nafion®.Examples of other membranes are chemically similar materials from theAsahi Chemical Industry Company (Aciplex®-S1004, Tokyo, Japan; m=0-2,and x=2-5), and formerly available from the Dow ChemicalCompany—(XUS-13204). These materials are made using slightly differentchemistry and have slightly different properties, with equivalentweights of 1100, 1000, and 900 respectively. Electrolyte filmthicknesses of about 100-125 μm result in cells with resistivities ofabout 0.1 Ω-Cm⁻² when operating at temperatures below the boiling pointof water under the particular imposed pressure conditions. Otheravailable membranes are Nafion® 112 (1100 Daltons, 2 mils, 50 μm drythickness), Nafion® 111 (1100 Daltons, 1 mil, 25 μm dry thickness, andGORE-SELECT® (W. L. Gore and Associates, Elkton Md.). The Gore materialshave Nafion® chemistry on an inert porous support (GORE-TEX® expandedPTFE, U.S. Pat. No. 5,547,551; Barbir et al., Abst. 1996 Fuel CellSeminar, National Fuel Cell Coordinating Group, Washington D.C., 505(1996)) and are available in total thicknesses of 10, 20, and 40 μm,potentially giving materials with very low ionic resistance and highrates of water transport.

Other polymer electrolyte materials that may be used include sulfonatedpolyphenylene oxide (PPO), sulfide, sulfone (PPS), etherketone (PEEK),polybenzimidazole (PBI), polybenzothiazoles, polyaromatic polyimides,fluorinated polystyrene, polyphosphazenes, phenylsiloxanes, and mixturescontaining basic polybenzazoles and acid sulfonated polyethers asdisclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,176,984, which is incorporated herein byreference.

Electrodes of the present invention preferably comprise electrocatalystssuch as transition metals or transition metal alloys. Examples of metalsthat may be used in the electrodes include, but are not limited to,platinum, palladium, cobalt, chromium, and ruthenium. Particularlypreferred electrocatalysts comprise platinum or platinum containingalloys, particularly alloys of platinum and one or more transitionmetals. Alternatively, the electrocatalyst may be based on other metalssuch as palladium or palladium containing alloys, particularly alloys ofpalladium and one or more transition metals. Electrodes may comprise anelectrocatalyst loaded onto a conducting support such as high surfacearea carbon. A typical support material is carbon black. Examples ofcommercially available carbon blacks are Vulcan XC-72R, Black Pearls2000 (BP2000) (Cabot Corporation), and the common acetylene blackShawinigan Black (SB). In a particular embodiment of the presentinvention electrodes comprise between about 5 wt % to about 90 wt % ofan electrocatalyst loaded onto carbon black.

The electrode material can be mixed with or suspended in a solution ofan ionic conducting material to form an ink, paste or a putty which canbe applied to a solid support to form the electrode. In one embodimentof the present invention, the solution of an ionic conducting materialis a solution of an ionic conducting polymer. In a particular embodimentof the present invention, the ionic conducting material is a polymericperfluorocarbon sulfonic acid. A particularly suitable ionic conductingmaterial is Nafion® (DuPont).

One aspect of the present invention is a fuel cell component comprisinga porous flow field and an electrocatalytically active layer applieddirectly onto the porous flow field. The term flow-field as used hereinrefers to a structure with suitable electronic and thermal conductivity,through which the gases are delivered so that they may contact the MEA,and through which reaction products may be eliminated. Ideally, the flowfield should be light and should be designed so as to facilitate waterand heat management. As mentioned above, conventional flow fieldsconsist of serpentine grooves machined into graphite plates. Not onlydoes this design add weight to the fuel cell stack because of the heavyend-plates and tie rods that are needed, but it also poses a watercontrol problem because product water collects in the grooves andhinders gas flow through the grooves. Moreover, a large pressuredifferential is required to force the gas through the flow field,necessitating pressurized operation of the stack.

Porous metal flow fields according to the invention are an improvementover solid flow fields. The porous metal allows gas flow withoutmechanically cut grooves, has low weight per unit area, iselectronically conductive and is relatively inexpensive.

Porous metals suitable as flow field material can include porous copper,porous nickel, porous aluminum, porous titanium, and porousaluminum-titanium alloys. The method of preparing the porous metalstructure used for the flow field is described in U.S. Pat. No.4,882,232, which is incorporated herein by reference. In that patent, anorganic polymer foam structure is chemically decapped, or opened up, bya reactive solvent bath, a thin metal layer is sputtered onto the entiresurface of the foam throughout its structure, and the resultingstructure is then coated with a chosen metal by electroless plating,followed by electroplating if required. The organic polymer foamstructure may be subsequently removed if required. The resulting openmetal geometries may be characterized as three-dimensional networks orthree-dimensional reticulated structures.

While the corrosion environment in the cell is relatively benign, suchmaterials may still undergo disadvantageous chemical change within thecell, e.g., corrosion accompanied by dissolution, or the gradual growthof oxide films with low electronic conductivity that seriously reducecell performance. Accordingly, the porous metal flow fields of thepresent invention may further comprise a protective coating layer. Theprotective coating layer can comprise a metal or metal oxide.Particularly preferred metals include tin, copper, nickel, aluminum,titanium, and gold. Examples of oxide layers include ruthenium dioxide,non-stoichiometric black Mageli phase titanium oxide (Ebonex™, EbonexTechnology Inc., Emeryville, Calif.), or tin oxide.

Tin is a metal on which a thick, poorly-conducting oxide film isgradually produced under PEM fuel cell operational conditions. Porousmetals not containing metallic tin, but comprising a thin layer of tinoxide on its surface can be used as metal flow fields. Tin oxide, whenin the form of a thin layer that is unable to grow further, has adequateconductivity and is stable in the pH range corresponding to the internalregion of an operating fuel cell (Pourbaix, Atlas d'EquilibresElectrochimiques a 25° C., Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 475-484 (1963)).Accordingly, one aspect of the present invention is a fuel cellcomponent comprising a porous metal flow field having a thin layer oftin oxide disposed on the surface of the porous metal. The tin oxidelayer must be thick enough to be continuous, and may be between about 1μm and about 5 μm thick, and is preferably between about 1 μm and about2 μm thick, and even more preferably between about 1 μm and about 1.5 μmthick.

Another aspect of the present invention is a method of constructing afuel cell comprising a porous metal flow field and a thin layer of tinor tin oxide disposed on the surface of the porous metal flow field.Examples of suitable techniques for disposing the tin or tin oxide layerinclude sputtering techniques, chemical vapor deposition, laserablation, and electroplating of metallic tin followed by oxidation inair or via anodizing, for example under PEM fuel cell operatingconditions. A particular embodiment of the present invention is a methodof constructing a fuel cell device comprising a porous metal flow fieldand a thin layer of tin oxide disposed on the surface of the porousmetal flow field, the method comprising using a sputtering technique toapply a thin layer of tin oxide to the surface of the porous flow field.According to a more particular embodiment of the present invention, tinoxide is applied to the porous metal flow field using a sputteringmethod comprising the steps of resistively heating an amount of tinoxide such that it vaporizes and allowing the vapor to impinge ontoporous metal flow field. Preferably, the sputtering method is performedat a reduced pressure. An advantageous aspect of the present inventionis that the porous metal flow fields permit the formation of sputteredlayers throughout their internal structure.

A further aspect of the present invention is a fuel cell componentcomprising a porous, i.e., three-dimensionally reticulated, metal flowfield and an electrode applied directly onto the porous flow field,wherein the porous flow field comprises a thin tin oxide layer on atleast one surface of the flow field of the porous metal and wherein theelectrode contacts the porous metal flow field at a surface thatsupports the thin tin oxide layer.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, the fuel cellcomponent comprises a porous flow field, a intermediate layer bondeddirectly to the surface of the flow field, and an electrode bondeddirectly to the intermediate layer.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, theintermediate layer comprises high surface area carbon particles such ascarbon black and may further comprise a polymer. Preferable polymersinclude fluorinate polymers such as polytetrafluoroethylene,perfluoropethylene-perfluoropropylene copolymer, perfluoroalkoxy polymeror polyvanilidine fluoride. The amount of polymer in the electricallyconducting intermediate layer is preferably between about 10 and about60% and more preferably between about 30 and about 40% by weight.According to one embodiment of the present invention, the intermediatelayer is very thin, preferably less than about 1 mm thick and morepreferably less than about 0.5 mm thick. According to anotherembodiment, the intermediate layer is discontinuous.

This intermediate layer is alternately referred to as a “diffusionlayer”, “support layer” or “backing layer”, and serves as a foundationfor the thin active catalytic layer in contact with the electrolyte andas an electronically-conducting bridge cementing the electrode to theflow field. It may also serve as a water-rejecting layer if it containsa hydrophobic agent such as Teflon® PTFE.

Another aspect of the present invention is a method for fabricating afuel cell component comprising the steps of bonding an intermediatelayer directly to a porous flow field and bonding an electrode directlyto the intermediate layer. An intermediate layer, as described above canbe applied to a porous flow field by rolling, calendering, pressing,printing, spraying, brushing, electrostatic spraying, and dry or wetfiltering. An electrode can also be applied to the intermediate layer byrolling, calendering, pressing, printing, spraying, brushing,electrostatic spraying, and dry or wet filtering.

In general, an intermediate layer acts as diffusional resistance inparallel with the electrode. It is therefore desirable to increase theporosity of the intermediate layer. Accordingly, a further aspect of thepresent invention is a method of making a gas diffusion electrodecomprising the steps of applying to a substrate a mixture comprising apolymer, an electrocatalyst, and fumed silica pore-former, and thentreating the electrode to remove the fumed silica pore-former.

To optimize the porosity in the electrode and the intermediate layers,pore-forming particles on the nanometer to micron (10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁴ cm)scale are preferred. This is much smaller than conventional porophoriccrystals and making such small particles by a physical technique such asgrinding is not practical. For certain materials, a chemical approach isfeasible. One of these materials is fumed silica, prepared byheat-treatment of silicic acid (hydrated silica precipitated fromaqueous solution). According to one aspect of the present invention,fumed silica may be used to increase the porosity of theelectrocatalytically active and intermediate layers of PEMFC electrodesand thereby obtain higher performance.

Fumed silica is incorporated into the layers, and subsequently removedto create an optimized porosity. Because fumed silica is soluble inalkali as silicate, it may be washed out with a base such as potassiumhydroxide or sodium hydroxide.

If the electrode contains acidic ion conducting polymer electrolytematerial, and is in contact with the PEM electrolyte during the basewash, the active layer must be treated to regenerate the active form ofthe electrolyte. Accordingly, one embodiment of the present invention isa method of making a fuel cell component comprising the steps ofapplying to a flow field or an intermediate layer a mixture comprisingan ionic conducting polymer electrolyte, a catalyst, and fumed silicapore-former, and treating the electrode to regenerate the active form ofthe electrode. The amount of filmed silica pore-former in the mixture ispreferably between about 20 and about 60% and more preferably betweenabout 35 and about 45% by weight. According to one aspect of the presentinvention, the fuel cell component is rinsed with an ion-exchangesolution to regenerate the acid form of the ionic conducting polymer.Suitable ion-exchange solutions include dilute acids such as dilutesulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid. Subsequent rinsingwith deionized water completes the treatment. If electrodes are to beused in alkaline fuel cells, the potassium hydroxide electrolyte itselfremoves the fumed silica and no further treatment is required.

According to one aspect of the present invention, electrodes areconstructed by applying the electrode to the intermediate layer. If theelectrocatalytically active material is suspended as a putty, paste, orink as described above, it may be applied by painting one or more layersof the electrocatalytically active material onto the intermediate layer.In one embodiment of the present invention, fumed silica is co-mixedwith the catalyst ink mixture and applied to the backing layer. Thelayer is treated to extract the pore-former and then treated withion-exchange solution and rinsed.

According to one aspect of the present invention, gas diffusionelectrodes are constructed by applying to a substrate a mixturecomprising a polymer, an electro catalyst, and fumed silica pore-former,and then treating the electrode to remove the fumed silica pore-former.The substrate is preferably carbon cloth, carbon felt, or carbon paper.The pore-treated electrodes can then be hot pressed onto an electrolytemembrane to form a MEA.

Alternatively, the substrate may be a porous flow field, as describedabove. Minimizing contact resistance between the flow field and the MEAis an important design consideration. Direct assembly of gas diffusionelectrodes onto porous flow-fields is an attractive way to minimize thecontact resistance.

In a further embodiment of the present invention, the electrode materialmay be mixed with or suspended in a solution of a precursor of an ionicconducting material to form an ink, paste or a putty, which can beapplied to a solid support to form the electrode. Such a precursor maybe a suitable large-cation salt of the sulfonic acid, such as aquaternary amine salt (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,211,984, 5,234,777, which areincorporated herein by reference). In the present embodiment of theinvention, the solution of the precursor of the ionic conductingmaterial is a solution of a resin which produces the PEM material afterchemical treatment, such as hydrolysis. Of particular interest in thisregard is the penultimate product of the synthesis of Nafion® (DuPont),the corresponding sulfonyl fluoride resin, which is a castable materialfrom which films are produced which become Nafion® films afterhydrolysis of the sulfuryl fluoride groups to sulfonic acid groups andhydrofluoric acid. In this case, the solid support may be the sulfonylfluoride resin film, which will become the electrolyte after hydrolysis,e.g., by reaction with water. Since silica is soluble in hydrofluoricacid as fluorosilicic acid, the hydrolysis operation will also extractthe fumed silica additive.

Introduction of pore-former into the fabrication procedure for theelectrode of the oxygen gas diffusion cathodes, followed by extractionof the additive, results in an increase in the volume porosity of theactive layers and in a significant decrease in mass transportresistance. The volume porosity has an optimal value. The electrodeperformance improvement of the optimal porosity value can be correlatedin a simple manner with the improved mass transport properties of theelectrode active layer. A further increase of porosity beyond theoptimal value negatively influences electrode performance because of theappearance of discontinuities in the solid phase in the electrode and anincrease in the active layer thickness. These respectively result inincreased ohmic resistance and unfavorable gas diffusion. A negativechange in the hydrophobic/hydrophilic pore volume ratio also occurs.

Another aspect of the invention is to provide a fuel cell stack thatprovides electrical power in a much lighter package. One embodiment ofthis invention is flow field-bipolar plate assembly comprising porousmetal flow fields at the anode and cathode of adjacent cells with anelectronically conducting bipolar plate or sheet between them acting asa gas separator. It is fabricated as a single piece so as to eliminatethe problem of contact resistance.

Referring to FIG. 1, such a flow field-bipolar plate assembly comprisestwo porous metal flow-field components 2 representing the anode andcathode flow-fields, with an impervious electronically-conducting foil,plate or sheet 1 in between to serve as a gas barrier or reactantseparator between the anode and cathode of adjacent cells. The gasbarrier may comprise tin, copper, nickel, aluminum, titanium, gold, oraluminum-titanium alloy. As previously stated, the porous components arepreferentially made via the method of U.S. Pat. No. 4,882,232, whichresults in lightweight open metal structures whose open porosity can beas high as 97%. These three dimensional reticulated metal structures maybe based on metals, including tin, copper, nickel aluminum, titanium,gold, and aluminum-titanium alloys. A particularly preferred metal isnickel. They may also comprise more than one metal, e.g., copper, onwhich nickel may be applied. In addition, such metals may be applied byinexpensive methods, such as electroless-plating and electroplating.Further the entire assembly of the two flow-fields and the imperviouselectronically-conducting plate or sheet may be fabricated in one pieceby application of pressure and electroplating, e.g., on a nickel foil,or by sintering under pressure after suitable reductive surfacetreatment to ensure correct direct metallic contact at the surfaces 3.

The bipolar plate does not directly contact the electrolyte in thePEMFC, and it should only contact slightly acid (ca pH 5-5.5) purewater. This allows some materials flexibility compared with the PAFC.The use of common metals is generally unsuccessful. The reason for thisis their previously-stated tendency to grow an anodic oxide film at thecathode side, which results in increasing contact resistance with time.Aluminum, titanium, and stainless steel, i.e., chromium, show thiseffect, and surface treatments such as gold-plating appear to showpin-hole effects which result in underlying film growth and spalling.

Thermodynamics (Pourbaix, Atlas d'Equilibres Electrochimigues a 25° C.,Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 333-336 (1963)) indicate that nickel shouldalso be unstable in regard to oxide film formation, but it behavessurprisingly well, especially under cathodic potential conditions. Undersuch cathodic conditions, its passive conducting oxide is the same asthat present in alkaline electrolyte in the metallic nickel positiveelectrode current collector of nickel cadmium, nickel-zinc, and nickelmetal hydride secondary batteries. Under anodic conditions,depassivation with formation of green divalent nickel ions may occur, atleast early in the cell operating life. Any anions associated withrelatively strong acids (e.g., fluoride from residual traces of sulfonylfluoride groups in the PEM electrolyte, or sulfate from trace hydrolysisof PEM sulfonic acid groups) are only present in very small amounts, asis apparent from the pH of the product water. Thus, the counter ion ismost likely carbonate. Even though divalent nickel ions have relativelylow solubility, these ions have been found in the PEM electrolyte, witha concentration gradient determined by scanning electron microscopeelectron probe analysis to be from the anode to the cathode side. Suchions can slowly exchange with protons in the PEM electrolyte, reducingits ionic conductivity as a function of time, which will eventuallyresult in cell failure. Thus protection of nickel on the anode side, forexample by tin oxide coating, is required.

Similarly, thermodynamics shows that copper should always be stable inthe presence of hydrogen on the anode side up to electrochemicalpotentials of up to 0.4 V versus the hydrogen electrode (Pourbaix, Atlasd'Equilibres Electrochimiques a 25° C., Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 387-388(1963)). However, copper will oxidize at the cathode (Pourbaix, Atlasd'Equilibres Electrochimiques a 25° C., Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 387-388 (1963)), and it requires protection at the anode in case exposureto air (oxygen) occurs when the hydrogen supply to the cell anode isturned off. In this case, in the present of platinum-basedelectrocatalyst and water, a galvanic cell is set up with reduction ofoxygen on platinum, with oxidation of copper via electrochemicalreaction with water. Thus, copper must be protected against thiseventuality with coatings, e.g., of nickel, followed by tin oxide.

Such structures may further comprise a protective layer of a metal or ametal oxide. Examples of protective metals include tin, copper, nickel,aluminum, titanium, and gold. Examples of protective oxides includeruthenium oxide, titanium oxide, and tin oxide. A protective layer of asuitable electronically conducting oxide, e.g., tin oxide, may beapplied by sputtering or by electroplating of metallic tin followed bygas phase, wet chemical or anodic oxidation. The flow fields of thepresent invention, as described above, are amenable to excellentpenetration by materials under sputtering conditions, and underelectroless plating and electroplating conditions. It is therefore anadvantage of the present invention that the protective layer can beapplied to both the bipolar plate and the porous flow fieldsimultaneously, subsequent to the construction of the monolithicassembly.

According to one embodiment, the protective layer is continuous. It maybe between about 1 and about 5 μm, preferably between about 1 and about2 μm, and even more preferably between about 1 and about 1.5 μm thick. Atypical porous metal sheet 1 mm thick made by the method of U.S. Pat.No. 4,882,232 has a total internal area of about 2.5 cm² and an internalvolume close to 0.1 cm³. Such a volume could contain about 6 mg ofnickel in the form of 1.0 molar plating solution. A 1 μm coating ofnickel throughout the structure would deplete only 2.3 mg from the bath,so these methods of coating would not be limited by throwing-power.

A further embodiment of this invention is a fuel cell in whichelectronic contact between these and other stack components, e.g., theelectrodes, and the membrane, are directly bonded together. A stackcomprising such “glued up” fuel cells has the advantage of not requiringpressure to maintain contact, although some lateral support can be usedto ensure sufficient strength. It will be apparent that the advantagesof such a “glued-up” or “cemented” structure will be reduced weight andvolume resulting from the elimination of the need for heavy, strongend-plates and tie-bars, and their replacement by lightweightstructures, as well as improved electronic contact throughout, a moreuniform current density, lower internal electronic resistance, andconsequently higher stack power density.

Referring to FIG. 2, one aspect of the present invention is anelectrochemical fuel cell comprising monolithic electrically conductingflow field-bipolar plate assemblies 4, as described above, arrangedessentially parallel to each other, electrically conducting intermediatelayers 5 bonded directly to the inside surfaces of the flowfield-bipolar plate assemblies 4, electrodes 6 bonded directly to thesurface of the electrically conducting intermediate layers 5, and apolymer electrolyte membrane 7 disposed between and bonded to both ofthe electrodes 6. The electrically conducting intermediate layers are asdescribed above.

A further aspect of the present invention is a fuel cell stackcomprising a plurality of fuel cells as described above.

PEMFCs using Nafion® electrolyte chemistry should operate with awater-saturated cathode exit gas stream if it is to work effectively,since otherwise the PEM electrolyte present between and within theelectrode structures will dry out and become non-conducting to hydrogenions. This will effectively cut off the functioning of the cell. Thiswill happen if the rate of production of water in the cell via theelectrode reactions, plus the rate of introduction of any other waterinto the cell, is less than the overall rate of water removal byevaporation from the cell via the cathode and anode gas exit streams.Because the PEMFC shows effectively no water vapor pressure suppression,the vapor pressure-temperature relationship which must be used toestablish the real behavior of the PEMFC is that for pure water at thesame temperature. As the electrode reaction equations show, the PEMFC(as with all acid electrolyte cells) produces water at the cathode.

The minimum value of 2.0 for the operating oxygen stoichiometry whenunpressurized or pressurized dry air is used at the cathode reactant inthe PEMFC immediately fixes the exit dew point of the cathode effluent.Each oxygen molecule used in the cell gives two water molecules, so thatunder these conditions the water vapor partial pressures injust-saturated exiting reactants are 0.190, 0.547, 0.479, and 0.592 atm,at total pressures of 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 atma, corresponding todew-points of 59.2° C., 73.8° C., 80.6° C., and 86.9° C. At thesetemperatures, the cathode exit will be essentially in contact withliquid water, but at the cathode entry, drying will take place unlessthere is an effective method for internal transfer of water from thecathode exit to the entry. In principle, this may be effected via waterexchange through a thin electrolyte to a counter-flow anode reactant,stream. Cells with approximately 50 cm² active area which do notincorporate such an active method of internal water transfer will onlyoperate in a stable manner when operating self-humidified (i.e., whensupplied with dry feedstock, with humidification only by product. water)if their operating temperature is less than approximately 52° C. Part ofthe internal water transfer in such cells is through the plane of themembrane itself, so larger cells may require a slightly lower operatingtemperature.

Thus, operation at higher temperature requires either externalhumidification (active addition of excess water to the cell),pressurization, or both. A drawback to pressurization is that itrequires part of the electrical output of the cell, and is inefficientbecause of the large number of molecules pressurized. Humidificationalso requires parasitic power, but the amount is much less than that forpressurization.

In the current density range of interest, humidified operation at about52° C. operating temperature showed a lower polarization slope,resulting in a performance at constant current density about 50 mV morepositive than that for self-humidified operation. The state-of-the artPEM electrolytes were then 125 μm thickness. This difference has beenreduced to practically zero as thinner PEM materials have becomeavailable (e.g., Nafion® 111 and 112, 25 and 51 μm; GORE-SELECT™, W. L.Gore and Associates, Elkton, Md., 20 or 40 μm). Only the anode gas flowmust be humidified to obtain correct performance, even at 75° C.

There are two options for atmospheric pressure stack operation. Thefirst is to operated under self-humidified conditions at about 52° C.using an oxygen stoichiometry close to 2.0. The other is to maintain asufficient supply of water to the anode side of the cell to ensure thatliquid water is always present there under the chosen cell operatingtemperature conditions. This allows operation at up to about 75°-79° C.In all cases, and especially when it is not in use with the activecooling operating, it is preferable that the fuel cell be protected fromdirect exposure to low-air-mass sunlight to ensure that its temperaturedoes not exceed that of normal operation. Thus, temperature and watermanagement are important considerations in fuel cell stack design.

One embodiment of the present invention is to cool the fuel cell stackusing direct-air cooling. Direct air-cooling preferably utilizeshigh-surface area internal cooling plates, preferably of metal to reducethermal transfer and electrical resistance. In this case, the PEMFCstack serves as its own heat-exchanger.

Porous metal is particularly suitable for use as cooling plates.According to one embodiment of the invention, the cooling platescomprise three dimensionally reticulated porous metal, as describedabove, as cooling plates.

One aspect of the present invention is a fuel cell component comprisinga one-piece porous metal flow field-bipolar plate assembly combined witha cooling plate. According to one embodiment, the flow field-bipolarplate assembly comprises porous metal flow field components 11metalurgically bonded to impervious electronically-conducting plates orgas barriers 12 (FIG. 3). The cooling plate comprises a porous metalcooling field 13 metalurgically bonded between the gas barriers 12.

The bond between the porous metal flow field component 11 and the gasbarrier 12 is preferably a continuous metalurgical bond. According toone embodiment, the porous metal flow field and the cooling barrier arebonded together by electroplating. According to an alternativeembodiment, the cooling barrier and the flow field are bonded bysintering.

The gas barrier and flow fields are as described above. The coolingfield may comprise a three dimensional reticulated structure. The metalis preferably selected from tin, copper, nickel, aluminum, titanium,gold, and aluminum-titanium alloy. The gas barriers may comprise a metalfoil and are preferably selected from tin, copper, nickel, aluminum,titanium, gold, and aluminum-titanium alloy, with nickel beingparticularly preferred. Because the cooling field only contacts air, itcan be sealed to the gas barrier using soft solder, making good thermaland electrical contact at interface 14.

A further aspect of the present invention is a fuel cell stackcomprising two electrically conducting endplates and a plurality ofelectrochemical fuel cells disposed between the endplates, wherein thefuel cells comprise porous flow field-bipolar plate assemblies combinedwith cooling plates, as described above. The electrochemical fuel cellsmay comprise a first and second monolithic electrically conducting flowfield-bipolar plate assemblies arranged essentially parallel to eachother such that an inside surface of the first flow field-bipolar plateassembly is facing an inside surface of the second flow field-bipolarplate assembly. The flow field-bipolar plate assemblies may beelectrically and mechanically connected by intervening layers. Theintervening layers may comprise a first electrically conductingintermediate layer bonded directly to the inside surface of the firstflow field-bipolar plate assembly, a second electrically conductingintermediate layer bonded directly to the inside surface of the secondflow field-bipolar plate assembly, a first electrode disposed on thesurface of the first electrically conducting intermediate layer, asecond electrode disposed on the surface of the second electricallyconducting intermediate layer, and a polymer electrolyte membranedisposed between and bonded to both of the electrodes. The bipolarseparator plates are preferably of the type described above, comprisingan electrically conducting gas barrier and a porous metal flow-fieldbonded to each side of the electrically conducting gas barrier bycontinuous metallurgical bonds.

The fuel cell stack of the present invention is a “glued-up” or“cemented” design. All parts of the stack, including the completecooling system minus the air blower, are included in the specifiedweights and volumes of the stack. One embodiment is a 5 kW atmosphericpressure stack, this includes endplates for current take-off. A stackwith 265 cm² cells would have a current of about 185.5 A at 0.7 V percell. Nickel-plated aluminum endplates only 3 mm thick allows forcollection of this current on central buses with about 1 mV voltage dropacross the plate, which can in any case be ribbed (if required) forefficient current collection.

Air-cooling of a self-humidified stack (52° C. operation) is feasible to40° C. ambient. It requires a 2.0 mm thick 97% porous copper foam platewith a characteristic radius of 0.75 mm, with spherically reticulatedinterlocking nets with a diameter of about 0.65 mm per reticulation unit(distance between parallel faces of hexagons). The gas flow-fields areof the “direct assembly” type consisting of nickel foams or interlockingnets. The materials used are 97% porous, with a characteristic radius of0.1 mm, but are otherwise identical in structure to the much coarsercopper foams used in the cooling plate.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the bipolar plate has anactive area of 265 cm², and is rectangular, with active area dimensionsof 9.3 cm×30 cm. To minimize the cooling work requirement, the coolingflow is at right angles to the long axis of the stack. The hydrogen foamflow-field is about 0.5 mm thick. This is feasible because of the lowflow-rate of hydrogen (21.5 cm³-s⁻¹ per cell at 0.7 A-cm⁻²). Theinternal volume of the anode flow-field in each cell is about 12.9 cm³.The hydrogen anode is fed from a manifold at one corner of therectangular flow-field, which is operated dead-headed. It has aprovision for a vent or bleed at the diagonally opposite corner of theflow-field. The volume of the bleed manifold is about 4.9 cm³. It isknown that the hydrogen anode is essentially reversible to currentdensities up to the region of 2.0 A-cm⁻², even at anodes with platinumloadings as low as 0.02 mg-cm⁻² (in the absence of carbon monoxide andother poisons). The anode will also operate reversibly up to at least90% hydrogen utilization. If 99.9% pure hydrogen is used as feedstock,impurities will reach 90% levels in the electrode and bleed manifoldafter operation for 780 s at 0.7 A-cm⁻². If bleeding occurs at thispoint, 1.9 cm³ of hydrogen will be lost, i.e., 0.01%. If bleeding isperformed at more frequent intervals, the hydrogen losses rapidlyincrease, e.g., to 0.35% at 194 s. A reasonable compromise is to operateto 50% utilization, at 431 s, which results in a loss of 0.1%. The bleedtime to replace the gas in the electrodes and bleed manifold at therated anode operating pressure at 0.7 A-cm⁻² will be 0.8 seconds. Thebleed valve, located in one of the endplates in-communication with thebleed manifold, will operate automatically.

The cathode nickel foam flow-field is like the anode, but is about 1.0mm thick. To simplify the manifolding, the cathode feedstock is fedalong the long axis of the flow-field, which has a rather low pressuredrop at the pertinent flow rates (1.2 m-s⁻¹).

The plate is 32.8 cm×10.1 cm overall. The three foams are separated bytwo nickel foils, each 0.025 mm (1 mil) in thickness. The three foamsare a single unit. It is also bonded to the endplates, using the sametechnique. The internal manifolding and bolt retention holes are cut outof the foam sandwich, which extends to the edges of the plate. The plateedges and manifolding areas are sealed with 0.4 mm of resin. Thebolt-holes are sealed with 3 mm of resin.

The individual weights of components are as follows: foils (totalthickness, 0.005 cm), 13.9 g; foams (total thickness 0.35 cm) 29.2 g;resin 11.6 g (density 1.2 g-cm⁻³). The ratio of active area weight tototal weight is 1.49. The total weight of each “minimalist” plate is54.6 g.

Most of the weight (about 250 g-m⁻²) and thickness (ca. 0.45 mm) of manyMEAs derive from the lightweight carbon cloths used as supports for thebacking layer. The directly-applied MEAs (essentially glued to theflow-fields by the conductive backing layer) eliminate these cloths, andextend to all cell edges (including those for the tie-bolts) and aresealed into the resin. The weight of MEAs is 11.7 g (at 400 g-m⁻²).

According to this embodiment, the total weight of each cell (plate plusMEA) is 66.3 g. The total weight of repeat parts in the 40-cell stack is2,652 g. The 3 mm thick nickel-plated aluminum endplates (with 4 mmchamfered edges) weigh a total of 527 g, and the eight 0.4 cm diameterretaining bolts (0.3 cm steel with insulated polymer coating) andassociated insulating washers weigh 109 g. The lightweight retention isonly to ruggadize the stack, since the scaling throughout, including thedirect formation of electrode structures on the nickel foams, is notparticularly high-strength. It is however more than adequate to avoideither electrical or thermal problems of contact resistance. Thebolt-holes passing through the stack (each 1 cm diameter) have beenallowed an effective area equal to 180% more than their true area toallow for any “shadowing” effects. There are six bolts within the activearea and two in the air manifold. The reason for placing the retainingbolts through the active area was to enable the use of a lightweightend-plate, which would otherwise have shown bowing effects (as well asbeing larger in area, hence heavier) if the bolts had been outside thestack edges. This would also not allow the stack to be within therequired specification for power per unit volume.

The reactant inlet tubes (one 1.6 cm diameter tube for air, one 0.8 cmdiameter for hydrogen) are located in communication with the manifold inone end-plate, and the hydrogen bleed valve is in the other. The totalweight of the stack, including all parts except for the reactant inlettubes, bleed valve, cooling shroud, fan, electric motor, and controls,would be 3.288 kg, giving 1.52 kW (net) per kg on this basis. The totalstack height would be 15.1 cm, so that the net power density would beexactly 1.0 kW per liter.

97% porous copper foams have suitable thermal and electricalcharacteristics for use as cooling plates. A rectangular cell andcooling plate may be used. According to one embodiment, the aspect ratiofor the 10.1 cm×30 cm cell is 2.94, with cooling along the long edge.The overall area of the flow field-bipolar plate assembly is 10.1cm×32.8 cm. The cell components consist of a 1.0 mm thick cathode foam,a 0.5 mm thick anode foam, two 0.025 mm nickel foils on either side ofthe cooling foil, and a MEA directly applied to the foams. The MEA, withits two backing layers, active layers, and the 40 mm (0.04 mm) PEMelectrolyte is about 0.1 mm thick with the carbon cloth layers removed.The total cell thickness is therefore about 1.65 mm, without the coolingplates, and before slight compression. A final thickness of 1.625 mm isnominally assumed. The total thickness of the 40 cells is therefore 6.5cm. With the endplates, the thickness becomes 7.1 cm. The required powerdensity should be 1 kW per liter, hence the permissible height of thestack is 15.1 cm. Thus, the total available cooling channel area is8.0×30 cm², i.e., 240 cm². Another foil is required for the coolingplate, but since all parts are slightly compressed during assembly, itsthickness is ignored.

According to one embodiment, there is one cooling plate per cell. Hencethe cooling plate thickness is 2.0 mm. The ratio of internal area tosuperficial area for this plate is 3.6 (for 97% porous). The pressuredrop is 4.75 cm/H₂O for the more open foam. Since the characteristiclength of the foam is now similar to that of the channel width (thethickness of the cooling plate), the wall effect will be apparent, (thewall area is 36% of the open area). This will increase the worst-casepower requirement. In the absence of experimental data with a system ofsuch complex geometry, it is reasonable to increase the value by about50% to about 200 W, i.e., 3.9% of stack power output.

According to another embodiment, the air-flow controller is governed bya feedback mechanism using information from thermocouples in the stack,placed e.g., in the anode flow-field.

Since the stack is marginally over-designed (total active area 274.3cm², rather than the assumed value of 265 cm²), its total grosselectrical output should be about 5.3 kW. Thus, the stack should have anet dc power output of close to 5 kW, since the cathode flow powerrequirement is expected to be appreciably less than that for cooling.The cooling load requirement will be about 5.8% of net output. Theefficiency requirement (55% based on the lower heating value, LHV, ofhydrogen) requires operation at 0.690 V at 0.999 hydrogen utilization(the hydrogen lost by the impurity bleed). Proposed operation at 0.70 Vcorresponds to 55.7% gross efficiency. However, after allowing forparasitic power, the net LHV efficiency will be only 52.7%.

Alternatively, if the device is not cooled using a temperature gradientappropriate to self-humidified operation, humidification may be in thesimplest and most effective manner. For self-sufficient operation, thiswill require the use of a condenser to remove some of the water exitingfrom the anode for recycling.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, humidification isused to increase the required ΔT to make cooling more efficient. Sincethe hydrogen anode is essentially reversible, collected product water(and extra water for humidification) can be passed to the anodemanifolding, where it will find its way into the cell. According to oneembodiment, a wicking arrangement may be also provided as needed.

According to another embodiment, a heat-exchanger operates as acondenser so water can be recovered for recycle. A stack operating at72° C. using evaporative cooling with a properly designed condenser witha 40° C. ambient entry temperature and 51.5° C. exit temperature willrequire quite a large volume of air. Thus, a stack cooling system designproblem in fact becomes replaced by a condenser design problem, in asystem of greater complexity than one which is directly air-cooled.However, the cooling flows can be minimized in the Evaporatively-CooledStack or Version II Stack, and are indeed considerably less than thosefor the Air-Cooled Baseline Stack.

According to one aspect of the present invention, humidified stack isfurther cooled via evaporative cooling of water. According to oneembodiment of the invention, the stack is evaporativly cooled and thehydrogen reactant is maintained at a slight over-pressure, so liquidwater passes through the electrolyte membrane. This over-pressure may besupplied from either a pressure cylinder or a metal-hydride bed. Eventhough complete evaporation may occur on the cathode side, the membranedoes not dry out since it is being continuously supplied with water.

According to one embodiment, a stack operating at 72° C. usingevaporative cooling with a properly designed 51.5° C. condenseroperating over a 32° C. ΔT at the condenser inlet (40° C. ambient, 72°C. cathode exit temperature) and a ΔT of 11.5° C. at its outlet (i.e.,ΔT approximately equal to 20° C. overall) will require a total amount ofcooling air which is considerably less than that for the air-cooledplate operating over a ΔT of 12° C., after correction for the sensibleheat carried away by the exiting cathode air stream at an oxygenstoichiometry of 3.0.

The condenser is disposed separate from the fuel cell stack, as depictedin FIG. 4. If the condenser is to be a separate unit, it is notnecessary to using a long, rectangular stack. One embodiment is a squarestack (16.7 cm×16.7 cm active area, containing 5,tie-bolts) comprisingthe same cathode foams, foils (one per cell, eliminating the coolingfoil), and MEAs as those already described. This embodiment furthercomprises a 0.75 mm anode foam with 0.3 mm deep grooves covering 50% ofthe area, each filled with wicking material would be used. To allow awater manifold to feed the wicks down the whole of one side of the stackperpendicular to the cells, the gas manifolding arrangements are similarto those previously described.

According to another embodiment, the condenser components areconstructed according to the same methodology of the monolithic fuelcell stack components described above. According to a particularlypreferred embodiment the same areas are used, except for the provisionof the cooling water manifold, which extends the overall cell area.According to one embodiment, the overall outside dimensions are 18.2 cmby 18.9 cm, with a triangular cutout, this time 1.4 cm×1.4 cm, on thecorner of the air inlet manifold, on the same side as the cooling watermanifold. The latter extended down the side to the hydrogen bleedmanifold, and was 15.3 cm×0.3. It was sealed on the outside with 0.4 mmof resin, but communicated directly with hydrogen in the anode. The cellthickness is 0.1875 cm and the stack height was 7.5 cm (8.1 cm including0.3 cm thickness endplates). The weight of each cell (8.7 g resin,including five retaining holes in the active area as before; 7.1 g foil,13.66 g nickel foam, 12.0 g of MEA, and 5.0 g or organic wick material)is 46.5 g, with a total of 1,858 g for stack repeat parts. The 0.3 mmthickness endplates add 530 g, and an (optional) wick occupying theevaporative cooling manifold adds 45.1 g, giving a total weight of 2,481g, including five bolts weighing 47.1 g. The overall volume is 2.84liters, giving 1.8 kW per liter and 2.0 kW per kg for the stack alone.

According to one embodiment the same arrangement as the stack previouslydescribed is proposed is used, with elimination of one foil and theair-cooling plates in the fuel cell stack. The dimensions of anodes andwicks remain as above. In this stack, the condenser has the same area asthe active cells (without the hydrogen and air inlet manifold area), isstacked in series. This results in an economy in weight.

A particular embodiment uses the same thickness components as thosegiven immediately above in the active fuel cell stack. Its area isslightly larger because of the liquid water manifold along one long side(e.g., on the side next to the hydrogen inlet manifold). This adds anextra area of 0.6×30.8 cm to each cell, which requires external scalingwith resin, and has a 0.2 cm×30 cm slot for the manifold wicking. Theweight of individual components per cell are: foils, 7.2 g, foams 13.35g, resin 9.95 g, MEA 12.2 g, wicks (in anodes) 5.0 g; total 47.7 g. Thetotal amount of wicking material in the manifold is 54.0 g. The activecells have a height of 7.5 cm.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, the cooling systemsits in series with the active stack cells. It has the same number andthickness of foams as the cathode, each with one foil and one 2 mmcooling cell. Because of the high rate of heat transfer compared with anair cooling plate, the length of the cooling flow channel can be reducedin overall area. According to one embodiment, this can be reduced to 25%of the fuel cell area. The plate dimensions (with edge seals on the longdimensions for cathode exit gas, on the short dimension for cooling air)are 30.8 cm×3.125 cm. The total weight of foils is 2.13 g per coolingcell, of foams 8.01 g, and of resin, 10.3 g, i.e., 20.44 g per unit, or817.6 g for 40 cooling cells, 12.1 cm in height (assuming zero componentcompression). The two endplates of the fuel cell stack (one chamferedover its perimeter, the other shared with the cooling stack, partlyunchamfered) weigh 540 g. The endplate for the cooling stack (alsoassume to be nickel-plated aluminum, 3 mm thick, and chamfered) weighs74 g. Eight bolts passing through both the active and cooling stacks, 3shorter ones passing through the active stack alone, and two passingthrough the active stack air manifold, adds, 94 g. The total height ofthe overall system is 20.5 cm. Thus, the total weight of the system is3.48 kg, and its volume is 4.03 liters. The complete delivers 1.44 kW(net) per kg, and 1.24 kW (net) per liter, within specifications. Itrequires 40.7% of the cooling air of the Baseline Stack under standardconditions. This, together with the shorter flow-channels, reduce thepressure drop by a factor of about 8 under these conditions. This andthe lower volume throughput reduce the parasitic power by about a factorof 20 (to about 15 W) compared with the final value for the BaselineStack. From 25 to ca 65 W will be required at higher ambienttemperatures, depending of the oxygen stoichiometry. Since the stack iscapable of 5.3 kW, it can be backed off to 5.0 kW net plus the powerdensity, and can supply its parasitic power required and still be withinthe required 55% LHV efficiency value (0.690 V at 0.999 hydrogenutilization). This is even true if hydrogen crossover is counted(estimated at 0.7% at 0.7 A-cm⁻²), which reduces hydrogen utilization to0.992.

The condensed water can be collected in a pan or sump, and directlypicked up by the internal wicking system of the fuel cell, either bydirect wicking into the hydrogen-filled cooling water manifold along thestack side, or via water injection into the manifold. The air exitmanifold to the condenser would be a 20.5 cm high box, 10.1 cm wide tothe fuel cell stack, and 3.125 cm wide to the condenser, occupying 400cm³ or less, and weighing about 70 g. It may also be able to produce asomewhat higher performance than the self-humidified Air-cooled BaselineStack, since it will have very efficient internal humidification.

The cooling system was designed for an extreme ambient of 40° C., but itwill in fact function at temperatures up to 50° C. (i.e., 122° F.) withhigher cooling flow and lower stoichiometries. This will result in anincrease in parasitic power requirements (to about 55 W).

The Baseline System (self-humidified, air-cooled) contains 0.234 m² ofMEA per kW. The weight of the nickel foils is 111.2 g per kW, with 233.4g of metal foam (133.4 g of copper, 100.0 g nickel). The weight of resinis 58 g per kW. The materials cost of the metal constructional parts(211.2 g nickel, 133.4 g copper) is 1.27 ¢ per kW for nickel at the“expected” price of $6.00 per kg and 18 ¢ per kW for copper (60 ¢ perlb.). The aluminum (66 ¢ per lb.) endplates cost 15 ¢ per kW. TheVersion II system contains 0.244 m² of MEA per kW, 204.5 g of nickel perkW ($1.23 per kW), 42.7 g of copper (6 ¢ per kW), and a total of 614 gof aluminum (18 ¢ per kW). The cost of the resin is a few cents per kWin each case.

The cost of future PEM electrolyte material will fall as new materialsbecome available. The key to a low-cost system is that for the metalparts and for fuel cell assembly. The materials costs for these parts(including resins) fall between $1.30 and $1.60 per kW for the BaselineSystem and Version II. In contrast to the cost of the catalyst and PEMmaterial, this is certainly acceptable. Porous metal sheets are made invarious ways, according to the chemical and physical properties of themetals. Refractory metals and alloys must be first made in sponge orfiber form. Powders can be made by chemical reduction or metal salts byalkali or other electropositive metals, e.g., titanium sponge. Fibersare generally made from chopped wire. Metals which can be electroplatedfrom aqueous solutions are a special case, since they can be plated onto a suitable electronically-conducting high-surface area “mold” from aplating bath with high throwing power. The “mold” commonly used is ablown organic foam of the type used for thermal insulation, which hasbeen treated according to the teaching of U.S. Pat. No. 4,882,232, firstby sputtering a metal following solvent decapping, by plating a metalwhich can be deposited by direct chemical reduction (electrolessplating), followed by electroplating if required. Nickel, and moreparticularly copper, are among such metals.

The foam with x=0.045 cm and with 97% porosity and surface area per unitvolume of 26.9 cm²-cm⁻³ has an effective thickness of 11 μm. Thisrepresents about 90 Coulombs of charge per cm² for a 1 mm thickreticulated foam, i.e., about 3000 s plating time at 30 mA-cm⁻². At 2.0V plating voltage, only 0.5 kWh of electric power, and about 0.25 kg ofnickel is required per m². Such foams are used in today's nickel-cadmiumand nickel metal hydride batteries as the current collector and supportfor the active material in at least the nickel electrode (and sometimethe cadmium electrode). It replaces the older, heavier sintered Mond(ex-carbonyl) nickel powder. Nickel-cadmium batteries typically arepriced at $800 per kWh, and the cost of the foam to the batterymanufacturer is in the region of $100 per kWh. A typical nickelelectrode has a capacity of 35 mAh-cm⁻² (at 1.2 V), so the cost per m²is about $40, or $8 per kW in the fuel cell. Making a foam attached to afoil (by plating) is no more costly. In larger production quantities,costs should fall, since the ultimate materials cost is only about 15%of the final cost.

The self-humidified approach requires a flow field-bipolar platestructure with an anode foam, an anode foil, an air cooling foam, and acathode foil. Since the foil to air-cooling foam to foil only contactsair (and no water from the cell or even electrolyte) in this designconcept, the low-technology concept can be for a “club sandwich”structure with very low-technology soft-soldered contacts between thefoils and the copper air-cooling foam. This will be sufficient for boththermal and electrical conduction. The minimum requirement for solderwill be about 50 g per m² (10 g-kW⁻¹) for the foam described in thatsection, or 10 g-kW⁻¹. Thus, the weight of the conceptualself-humidified stack, which requires two such structures (one on eachside of the air-cooled foam) would increase by only 20 g-kW⁻¹.

The condenser of Version II requires two foils on each side of a cathodeexit gas foam, each of which in turn contacts a copper cooling foil.Neither double structure can be effectively made by plating, but suchdouble structures are not even necessary. Each condensation cell onlyrequires a very good thermal contact to the neighboring exit cathodereagent cell, so it is only there that solder is required. The physicalcontact between one side of the copper cooling foam and the foil of thenext condenser cell for cathode effluent gas is easily made by theproposed retention bolts. Since the cooling cell and condensation cellare monolithic, this gives no significant heat-transfer problem.

EXAMPLE 1

Variations of the gas diffusion layer thickness, type of carbon black,the amount of PTFE in the active layer, and the amount of Pt supportedon carbon were used to determine the combination of factors required toachieve highest performance. The best-performing early electrodes werethose with a support layer loading of 10 mg-cm⁻² carbon (acetyleneblack), and a catalyst layer with 4.0 mg-cm⁻² platinum as 60 wt %platinum on carbon, with a PTFE content of 6 wt %. Electrodes preparedusing the dry method showed very promising results when tested in small5 cm² cells, and were able to reproduce performances previouslyachieved. FIG. 5 shows the current-potential dependence for a cell withan MEA using Nafion® 112 electrolyte and 3.9 mg-cm⁻² platinumelectrodes. The steady-state cell potential over 100 hours was 0.68 V ata current density of 0.7 A-cm⁻². This is only 20 mV lower than thetarget performance; however, this cell was operated under humidifiedconditions.

The effect of changing the Pt loading of the supported catalyst was theninvestigated in some detail using the GORE-SELECT™ (U.S. Pat. No.5,547,551) (W.L. Gore and Associates, Elkton, Md.) 20 μm thick membrane.Cathodes with total platinum loading of 1.4 mg-cm⁻² but with differingwt % platinum on carbon ratio on Vulcan XC-72R furnace black (CabotCorporation) were prepared and tested in 5 cm² test cells. The anode Ptloading was maintained at 0.3 mg-cm⁻². The cell potential vs. currentdensity plots are presented on FIG. 6. The results show that an MEA with60 wt % platinum on carbon electrocatalyst shows a ca. 50 mV higherpotential at constant current density than one with 40 wt % platinum oncarbon electrocatalyst. The improvement mainly results from the higherplatinum utilization in the 60% platinum on carbon electrocatalyst (FIG.7). Newer results with higher BET surface area platinum (80 m²-g⁻¹)exceeds 0.78 A-cm² at 0.7 V.

EXAMPLE 2

PEMFCs with gas diffusion electrodes prepared with 1.2 mg-cm⁻² (cathode)and 0.05 mg-cm⁻² (anode) were studied to determine the effect ofproprietary porophoric or pore-forming (PF) additives in the cathodeactive layer in amounts varying from 20 to 60 wt %. The pore-former wasadded to the catalyst-Nafion® mixture (ink), which was followed byultrasonic agitation. After painting the active layers onto thesubstrate, the electrodes were treated to extract the pore-former. MEAsof 50 cm² active area were fabricated by hot pressing of these cathodesand low-platinum-loading anodes onto Nafion® 112. Their performance wasevaluated at 50° C. with humidified hydrogen, oxygen, and air atatmospheric pressure. FIG. 8 shows the hydrogen-air cell potentialversus current density for the MEAs as a function of the PF loading. Theresults show that the performance improves when the amount of PF isincreased to a level of 40 wt %. However, a further increase in thequantity of PF results in a reduction in performance. FIG. 9 shows thehydrogen-oxygen cell performance for the above group of MEAs. Theinfluence of the amount of pore forming additive on mass transportprocesses in the active layer of the oxygen electrode may be evaluatedfrom both sets of data. FIG. 10 shows the current density generated byhydrogen-air PEMFCs at two different cell potentials as a function ofamount of PF. It appears that the optimal amount of PF is 40 wt % bothat 0.6 V and at 0.3 V. FIG. 11 shows the influence of the amount of PFon ohmic resistance in the MEAs studied, as calculated from the slopesof the linear part of the potential vs. current density plots whileoperating on hydrogen and oxygen. Because the same membrane (Nafion®112) and MEA structure was used in each case, the only variableparameter was the amount of PF used in the preparation of the activelayer of the cathodes. The results show the same optimal value (40 wt %)of PF at 0.6 V (FIG. 10).

Introduction of PF into the fabrication procedure for the active layerof the oxygen gas diffusion cathodes, followed by extraction of theadditive, results in an increase in the volume porosity of the activelayers and in a significant decrease in mass transport resistance. Itwas found that the volume porosity had an optimal value. The electrodeperformance improvement of the optimal porosity value could becorrelated in a simple manner with the improved mass transportproperties of the electrode active layer. A further increase of porositybeyond the optimal value negatively influenced electrode performancebecause of the appearance of discontinuity in the solid phase in theactive layer and an increase in the active layer thickness. Theserespectively resulted in increased ohmic resistance and unfavorable gasdiffusion. A negative change in the hydrophobic/hydrophilic pore volumeratio also occurred. At optimal PF loadings, the current density at 0.7V increased from 370 mA-cm⁻² to 480 mA-cm⁻².

EXAMPLE 3

To fabricate lightweight bipolar components, metal-based structures wereexamined. Aluminum bipolar hardware is only in contact with pure waterin the PEM, but it is under electric field conditions, and develops anon-conducting oxide film more or less rapidly. Stainless steel andtitanium are similar, although their oxide films develop more slowly.Tin oxide should be thermodynamically stable, and it is also conducting.

Aluminum: Tests using uncoated aluminum showed rapid decline of cellperformance within a few days (see FIG. 12). This was due to oxidationof the aluminum, resulting in decreased conductivity of the contactsurfaces. Tests using electroless gold plating on aluminum were thenperformed. The deposits obtained were examined using electron microscopyto verify the presence of a low-porosity film and if good contactexisted between the deposit and the substrate. A gold-plated aluminumcell structure was constructed and tested. After approximately 100 hoursof operation, the gold film failed in many places due to growth of thealuminum oxide film underneath, presumably at defects in the film. Allfurther attempts to plate gold, e.g., on to aluminum, gave initiallystable results, but the presence of pinholes results in growth of anunderlying oxide film, which caused the gold film to peel.

Stainless Steel: Experiments were then carried out with stainless steelfixtures. A 900 hour endurance test showed little deterioration inperformance. FIG. 13 shows the dependence of the cell potential vs.current density behavior on operating time. Losses are mainly due tohigher polarization resistance at high current densities. The catalyticactivity of the electrodes was not much affected, as is shown in FIG.14. Preliminary tests with a titanium nitride coating on the stainlesssteel showed that the coating was not stable and peeled off quiterapidly.

A two-week endurance test carried out with stainless steel fixturescoated with titanium nitride showed some deterioration in performance.FIG. 15 the dependence of the cell potential vs. current density plot onoperating time. Again, losses were mainly due to a higher polarizationresistance at high current densities. The electrocatalytic activity ofthe electrodes was not affected, as FIG. 16 shows. This endurance testconfirmed the preliminary findings that the titanium nitride coating onthe oxygen side of the MEA is unstable and oxidizes quite rapidly.

Platinum-Coated Titanium: After being first tested with conventionalgraphite endplates to verify its performance, an MEA wasendurance-tested in a 5 cm² cell with platinum-coated titanium plates.The initial performance in both sets of hardware on hydrogen and oxygenreactants was similar. Data from the life test are presented in FIG. 17.There was a slight loss in performance over time when platinum-coatedtitanium plates were used. The 500-hour endurance test showed littledeterioration of performance in the high current density region.

Tin: According to Pourbaix (Pourbaix, Atlas d'EquilibresElectrochimiques a 25° C., Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 475-484 (1963)), tinoxide should be stable. It is also a well-known electronic narrow-gapsemiconductor. However, the thin corrosion film formed during attemptsto use tin-foil also had a resistance which increased with time.

However, if a thin layer of tin (about 1 to about 5 μm thick) is used tocoat the bipolar assembly, the thickness of tin oxide that can form islimited. A thin layer of tin oxide is a suitable coating and is stableunder fuel cell operating conditions.

EXAMPLE 4

Direct Assembly of Gas-Diffusion Electrodes on Porous Flow-Fields: FIG.18 shows the performance of a gas diffusion electrode assembled directlyon a porous nickel flow field (circles). The experiment was conducted at55° C. using humidified gasses. The cathode loading was 0.2 mg/cm² ofplatinum on high surface area carbon and the hydrogen anode loading was0.05 mg/cm² of platinum on high surface area carbon. Included in FIG. 18is data for ribbed graphite in mechanical contact with a MEA (squares)and data for porous nickel in mechanical contact with a MEA (dottedline) acquired under the same operating conditions. It can be seen thatin the current density range of interest (0 to about 600 mA/cm²), gasdiffusion electrodes directly assembled on porous nickel flow fields outperform electrodes mechanically contacting porous nickel and ribbedgraphite flow fields.

EXAMPLE 5

Porous Copper: The first metal to be examined was 95% porous copper,whose Pourbaix diagram indicates that it should be quite stable (i.e.,immune from corrosion) in the slightly acid conditions (product water atabout pH 5.5) at the anode at overpotentials up to +0.4 V. Somecorrosion is to be expected at higher potentials, depending on thenature of the anion of the acid present. If sulfate is present fromdesulfonation of the PEM material, or Cu²⁺ fluoride from any remainingunhydrolyzed acid fluoride intermediate or from decomposed polymerchains, some solubility would be expected. The predicted equilibriumsolubility is about 0.015 moles per liter, but pH 5.5 (3×10⁻⁶ M H⁺)indicates that the concentration of strong-acid anions is far belowthis, so the equilibrium concentration cannot be supported. If the acidis largely carbonic acid (from air), a stable carbonate film, which maybe non-conducting, is expected. Copper may be relatively easilygold-plated to protect it from corrosion in this region.

Porous Nickel: At first sight, nickel is a less attractive candidatethan copper. Its Pourbaix diagram shows apparent solubility up to +0.8V, with probable passivation at higher potentials. At pH 5.5, itsequilibrium solubility should be greater than 1 M if the local anionpermits. From the argument given for above for copper in the presence ofsulfate and fluoride, this is clearly not the case in the PEMFC. As inthe case of copper, nickel carbonate would be expected if weak carbonicacid is responsible for the majority of the acidity, which should resultin a passivating film. If the argument that the low concentration ofstrong acid anions will not permit nickel concentrations to exceed1.5×10⁻⁶ molar is valid, nickel should not be immune except at negativeanode (hydrogen evolution) overpotentials equal to about −0.1 V.

Highly-porous (97% porosity) nickel sheets (nickel “foams”) were testedin a 50 cm² single cell. The foams were of the same type as those usedas the conducting support for the active material in recent nickelpositive electrodes in nickel-cadmium and nickel-metal hydride secondarycells, and are based on electroless- and electroplating of polymer foams(e.g., polyurethane). The reticulation dimension was about 0.21 mm.

Again, a low-loading MEA was used to compare performance with a standardribbed graphite bipolar structure. The composition of the MEA testedwas: platinum loadings, 0.23 mg-cm⁻² pure platinum as 30 wt % alloy ongraphitic carbon (cathode); 0.05 mg-cm⁻² as E-TEK 10 wt % platinum oncarbon (anode); Nafion® 112 membrane. The MEA was tested at 50° C., withexternally humidified reactants at atmospheric pressure. During thetests, constant reactant gas stoichiometries (anode, 1.05; cathode 2.1)were maintained. Two performance evaluations were carried out: (i) witha standard ribbed graphite flow field, and (ii) with high porositynickel sheets as flow fields. The current-potential results for bothflow-field designs operating on hydrogen-air are shown in FIG. 19.

Below 400 mA-cm⁻², cell performances were equal for both types offlow-fields. The lower performance of the cell with porous nickel flowfield at higher current density is probably caused by a combination ofhigher contact electrical resistance, as well as from increased gasdiffusion limitations. This is confirmed by results in FIGS. 20 and 21.FIG. 20 shows the current-potential behavior of the MEA in both types offlow-fields operating as hydrogen-oxygen cells. The slope of the linearpart of the polarization curve for the porous nickel flow-field ishigher than that for the standard ribbed graphite flow-field. Since thesame MEA was used in both tests, the observed increase of the slope mustresult from poorer electrical contact between the MEA and porous nickel,compared with the contact to ribbed graphite. In addition, gas diffusionlimitations within the porous nickel flow field are higher than with theribbed graphite flow field, as FIG. 21 shows. In it, the potentialdifference for each cell operating at the same current density on pureoxygen and on air are plotted as a function of current density. Atcurrent densities higher than 400 mA-cm⁻², gas diffusion limitations inthe cell with a porous nickel flow field are higher than those with thestandard flow field design.

As in the case of Spectracarb Carbon Paper, nickel foams were tested asgas flow fields with high-platinum-loading membrane electrode assemblies(MEAs). The oxygen gas diffusion cathodes fabricated in-house consistedof 1.25 mg-cm⁻² platinum, which were supplied as 60 wt % platinumsupported on Vulcan XC-72R carbon (catalyst purchased from E-TEK, Inc.).The anodes (also in-house fabrication) were 0.05 mg-cm⁻² platinumsupplied as 10 wt % platinum on Vulcan (E-TEK, Inc.). MEAs of 50 cm²active area were prepared from these electrodes and Nafion® 112membranes (CG Processing, Inc.) by hot-pressing. After evaluation of theMEA with standard ribbed graphite gas flow fields, the test cell wasdisassembled and the gas flow fields were exchanged for nickel foam. Theperformance evaluation procedure was then repeated under the sameoperating conditions as before.

FIG. 22 shows the cell potential-current density characteristics of thehigh-loading-cathode MEA with graphite and nickel foam gas flow fields.In this case, there was no difference in the cell performance until acurrent density of 800 mA-cm⁻². The observed performance loss atextremely high current densities was caused by increased gas diffusionlimitations inside the nickel foam gas flow-field. These results wereconfirmed that exactly the same MEA performance was obtained when thecell operated on pure oxygen, where no diffusion limitations due to thepresence of reactants (as distinct from those resulting from thepresence of product water) would be expected.

To verify the corrosion resistance of nickel foam gas flow-fields underPEMFC operating conditions, a performance endurance test was conducted.FIG. 23 shows results of a seven-day endurance test on a hydrogen/airPEMFC with nickel foam as a gas flow field. The results show that nodecrease in performance was observed. In this cell, the nickel foamdirectly contacted the carbon cloth of the MEA, so the only contactbetween nickel and an electrolytic phase was with water. Hence,corrosion of nickel appears to be negligible under these conditions.

Integrated Nickel Foam Flowfields: Further experiments directconstruction of the electrode structure on the flow-field. Theelectrodes were fabricated by carefully rolling a teflonized carbonblack in a form of thick paste (“dough”) onto the porous nickel sheetsto form a supporting gas-diffusion layer. On this layer the active layerwas deposited. It consisted of a graphitized carbon-supported platinumalloy catalyst (IFC Pt—Cr—Co, Ref. 19) and 5 wt % Nafion® solution. Theplatinum loading of the electrodes was 0.25 mg-cm⁻² (cathode) and 0.05mg-cm⁻² (anode). Nafion® 112 membrane was used as the polymerelectrolyte. A membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) with an active area of50 cm² was fabricated by hot pressing the electrodes to both sides ofthe membrane. In the results shown in FIGS. 24 to 26 (see below), theMEA produced in this manner is labeled “Mechanical Contact,” and it madeonly a physical contact with the porous nickel flow-field. A second MEAwith the same electrode composition and the same membrane was fabricatedon porous nickel using the procedure described above. It is labeled“Direct Assembly” in FIGS. 24 to 26.

A performance evaluation of both types of MEA was carried out in a 50cm² single cell with internally humidified hydrogen, air, and oxygenreactants at atmospheric pressure at 50° C. The cell potential as afunction of current density for both MEAs is shown in FIG. 24(hydrogen-air) and FIG. 26 (hydrogen-oxygen for diagnostic purposes). Itis apparent that the “Mechanical Contact” MEA had a worse performance atcurrent densities over 200 mA-cm⁻² than that of the “Direct Assembly”MEA. This difference is better illustrated by the results shown in FIG.24. As in the case of porous carbon, the loss of performance when theMEA operated on air was due to increased gas-diffusion limitationscaused by filling of part of the pores in the nickel sheet withteflonized carbon black. This blockage of the pore resulted in adecrease of volumetric porosity from 97% (for the as-receivedhigh-porosity nickel) to 75% (for a nickel substrate incorporating thegas diffusion layer). A comparison of the data when the MEAs operated onpure oxygen (FIG. 26) showed a lower slope for the linear part ofcurrent-potential plot for the “Mechanical Contact” MEA. This result isobviously due to the lower contact resistance between the gas-diffusionlayer and porous nickel flow field when the electrode is fabricateddirectly onto the flow field. These initial results show that highlyporous nickel is a very promising material for fabricating light-weightflow fields and bipolar plates for PEMFCs.

The weight of a 97% porous nickel or copper foam with a thickness equalto 0.5 mm is about 135 g-m⁻², representing a materials cost of 80 ¢ perm² (16 ¢ per kW at maximum power) based on the cost of metallic nickelat $6,000 per metric ton.

From the foregoing detailed description of specific embodiments of theinvention, it should be apparent that a method and apparatus forgenerating electrical power using a fuel cell has been disclosed.Although specific embodiments of the invention have been disclosedherein in some detail, this has been done solely for the purposes ofillustrating various aspects and features of the invention, and is notintended to be limiting with respect to the scope of the invention. Itis contemplated that various substitutions, alterations, and/ormodifications, including but not limited to those design alternativeswhich might have been specifically noted in this disclosure, may be madeto the disclosed embodiment without departing from the spirit and scopeof the invention as defined in the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. An electronically conducting fuel cell componentcomprising: a) a porous metal flow field comprising pores; b) anintermediate layer bonded directly to the porous metal flow field; andc) an electrode bonded directly to the intermediate layer wherein theporous metal flow field is configured to deliver gaseous reactants tothe intermediate layer by flowing through the pores of the porous metalflow field.
 2. The fuel cell component of claim 1, wherein the porousflow field comprises a three-dimensional reticulated metal structure. 3.The fuel cell component of claim 2, wherein the three-dimensionalreticulated structure comprises porous copper, porous nickel, porousaluminum, porous titanium, or a porous aluminum-titanium alloy.
 4. Thefuel cell component of claim 3, wherein the three-dimensionalreticulated structure comprises porous nickel.
 5. The fuel cellcomponent of claim 1, wherein the porous metal flow-field furthercomprises a protecting layer disposed on at least one surface thereof.6. The fuel cell component of claim 5, wherein the protecting layercomprises a metal or a metal oxide.
 7. The fuel cell component of claim6, wherein the protecting layer comprises tin, copper, nickel, aluminum,titanium, or gold.
 8. The fuel cell component of claim 6, wherein theprotecting layer comprises ruthenium oxide, titanium oxide, or tinoxide.
 9. The fuel cell component of claim 8, wherein the protectinglayer comprises tin oxide.
 10. The fuel cell component of claim 9,wherein the tin oxide layer is between about 1 and about 5 μm thick. 11.The fuel cell component of claim 10, wherein the tin oxide layer isbetween about 1 and about 2 μm thick.
 12. The fuel cell component ofclaim 1, wherein the intermediate layer comprises a polymer and carbonparticles.
 13. The fuel cell component of claim 12, wherein the polymercomprises poly-tetrafluoroethylene, perfluoroethylene-perfluoropropylenecopolymer, perfluoroakoxy, or polyvanilidene fluoride.
 14. The fuel cellcomponent of claim 1, wherein the electrode comprises a polymerelectrolyte and an electrocatalyst.
 15. A method for making anelectronically conducting fuel cell component comprising the steps of:a) directly bonding an electrically conducting intermediate layer to aporous metal flow field comprising pores; and b) directly bonding anelectrode to the intermediate layer wherein the porous metal flow fieldis configured to deliver gaseous reactants to the intermediate layer byflowing through the pores of the porous metal flow field.
 16. The methodof claim 15, wherein the porous flow field comprises a three-dimensionalreticulated metal structure.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein thethree-dimensional reticulated structure comprises porous copper, porousnickel, porous aluminum, porous titanium, or a porous aluminum-titaniumalloy.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the three-dimensionalreticulated structure comprises porous nickel.
 19. The method of claim15, wherein the porous metal flow-field further comprises a protectinglayer disposed on at least one surface thereof.
 20. The method of claim19, wherein the protecting layer comprises a metal or a metal oxide. 21.The method of claim 20, wherein the protecting layer comprises tin,copper, nickel, aluminum, titanium, or gold.
 22. The method of claim 20,wherein the protecting layer comprises ruthenium oxide, titanium oxide,or tin oxide.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the protecting layercomprises tin oxide.
 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the tin oxidelayer is between about 1 and about 5 μm thick.
 25. The method of claim24, wherein the tin oxide layer is between about 1 and about 2 μm thick.26. The method of claim 15, wherein the intermediate layer comprises apolymer and carbon particles.
 27. The method of claim 26, wherein thepolymer comprises poly-tetrafluoroethylene,perfluoroethylene-perfluoropropylene copolymer, perfluoroalkoxy, orpolyvanilidene fluoride.
 28. The method of claim 15, wherein theelectrode comprises a polymer electrolyte and an electrocatalyst. 29.The fuel cell component of claim 1, wherein the intermediate layercomprises a polymer and carbon black.
 30. The method of claim 15,wherein the intermediate layer comprises a polymer and carbon black.